🔗 Share this article

Established parties in power are increasingly enabling the radical right to dictate the public discourse, according to a new research carried out in the Federal Republic of Germany.

Academics discovered that this trend has inadvertently benefited radical groups by legitimising their ideas and disseminating them to a broader audience.

Study Drawing from Two Decades of Media Coverage

The results, released in the academic journal on political studies, relied on an computerized content review of over 520,000 articles from six German publications.

Capital-based researchers noted that as the far right shifted from marginal topics in the 1990s era to central themes like assimilation and immigration, mainstream parties increasingly adapted their communication in response.

This adjustment boosted the spread of these ideas and indicated to voters that such positions were legitimate.

Implications for Democratic Systems

"Public communication by mainstream parties is crucial in the voting performance of the radical right," explained a political sociologist involved in the study.

"This element has been overlooked," she noted.

The effect was noticeable even when mainstream parties were criticising the far right. "They still receive focus," the expert remarked. "The main point is that because we live in such a battle for attention, this attention is key."

Mainstreaming Phenomenon Throughout the Continent

While the study was centered around Germany, this normalisation effect is probable to apply to countries throughout the European continent.

"This is frequently observed in German and British news outlets," explained another researcher. "Radical groups says something and everybody begins discussing it for one week."

"Although you're opposing it, you're repeating it," he added.

Toughening of Public Rhetoric

At times, political figures have also toughened their language to align with that of the radical right.

In a recently published discussion, a former national leader advocated widespread expulsions and urged them to happen "more often and faster."

Comparable examples can be observed across the continent, as elected officials from nations including the UK to the French Republic embrace the rhetoric of the far right, particularly on migration.

This has formed an echo chamber that was unthinkable a ten years prior.

Central Problem: Who Sets the Narrative?

"{If you're a centrist party and you are discussing cultural issues – migration, assimilation – in a way that is determined by the pace of the far right, that's the whole idea of narrative control," explained a researcher.

Other political parties have gone one step further, attempting to emulate the hardline agenda of the far right, despite studies suggests that this approach leads voters to cast their ballot for the far right.

Progressive Impact and Public Perception

The scope of data gathered showed that the impact of radical parties had been gradual and had increased over time.

"Public perception doesn't change from day to day," stated a co-author. "However, when you hear this negative framing around immigration every second week, and it is being spread not only by far-right parties but also, for example, by established parties, then of course this storyline travels further."

Need for Mainstream Groups to Carve Out Their Distinct Narratives

The study highlighted the need for mainstream parties to develop their own narratives, particularly on topics such as migration and assimilation, instead of constantly trailing after the far right.

"It resembles a choreography," explained one researcher. "If the conductor is far-right and you're reacting to it, you cannot decide which tune should be playing."